Galexia

Submission - Joint response to the Review of the Electronic Funds Transfer Code of Conduct (2008)

Proposal B4


[ Galexia Dots ]

We propose to tailor the requirements for transactions performed using newer electronic payment products with the following features:

(a) the product issuer is not able to cancel the product if it is lost or stolen;

(b) there is no electronic authentication mechanism to safeguard consumers against unauthorised transactions (e.g. a PIN or electronic signature is not required); and

(c) the maximum value that can be held on the product at one time is $100 or less.

The general requirements under the EFT Code would not apply to transactions using these products. For example, the requirement to give periodic statements and the rules allocating liability for unauthorized transactions would not apply. Table 4 summarises the tailored requirements that would apply under our proposal. 

 

B4Q1 Do you agree with this proposal? Please give reasons.

Consumer stakeholders support these proposals.

B4Q2 Is $100 the right cut off point for this lighter-touch regime?

Consumer stakeholders support a $100 cut-off point for the customised clauses for newer electronic payment products. The cut-off point should be reviewed as part of each review of the EFT Code.